TLDR
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if you need: World's best coding (80.9% SWE-bench), autonomous agents (66.3% OSWorld), extended reasoning with effort control, best prompt injection resistance, and maximum capability regardless of cost.
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if you need: 50x lower cost ($0.10 vs $5), extreme speed (250 tokens/sec), massive context (1M vs 200K tokens), multimodal output generation, and built-in code execution/search.
Budget: Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/$0.40 per million tokens) is 50x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 ($5/$25 per million tokens).
Performance: Claude Opus 4.5 maximizes capability. Gemini 2.0 Flash maximizes speed and cost efficiency.
Overview
Claude Opus 4.5, released on November 24, 2025, represents Anthropic's most powerful model. It achieves the world's highest coding scores (80.9% SWE-bench Verified), introduces extended thinking with configurable reasoning depth, and includes a Memory Tool for persistent information storage beyond the context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash, released on February 5, 2025, is Google's next-generation model optimized for speed and cost. It processes requests at 250 tokens/sec with a massive 1 million token context window, all while costing 50x less than premium flagship models.
This comparison represents fundamentally different philosophies: Claude Opus 4.5 pursues maximum capability, while Gemini 2.0 Flash pursues maximum efficiency.
Basics: Model Specifications
| Feature | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | November 24, 2025 | February 5, 2025 |
| Developer | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max Output | 64K tokens | Not disclosed |
| Knowledge Cutoff | March 2025 | Not disclosed |
| Modalities (Input) | Text, Vision | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Multimodal Output | ✗ Text only | ✓ Yes |
| Extended Thinking | ✓ Yes (with effort parameter) | ✗ No |
| Memory Tool | ✓ Beta | ✗ No |
| Built-in Tools | Standard function calling | Code execution, search |
| Speed | Standard | 250 tokens/sec |
Want to automate your workflows?
Miniloop connects your apps and runs tasks with AI. No code required.
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Pricing Comparison
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | Cost Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | $0.10 | $0.40 | Baseline |
| Claude Opus 4.5 | $5.00 | $25.00 | 50-62.5x more expensive |
For a typical task using 500,000 input tokens and generating 50,000 output tokens:
- Gemini 2.0 Flash: $0.07 per request
- Claude Opus 4.5: $4.75 per request
Gemini's extreme cost efficiency makes it viable for consumer applications and high-volume production systems. Claude Opus 4.5 targets applications where capability matters more than cost.
Note: Claude Opus 4.5 offers up to 90% cost savings with prompt caching and 50% with batch processing.
Performance: Benchmark Comparison
Coding Performance
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.9% | Not disclosed | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| General Coding | Not disclosed | 90% | - |
Claude Opus 4.5's 80.9% SWE-bench score is the highest in the world, making it the undisputed leader for real-world software engineering tasks.
Computer Use & Agentic Tasks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | 66.3% | Not disclosed | Claude Opus 4.5 |
Claude Opus 4.5 dominates computer use and autonomous agent benchmarks with its 66.3% OSWorld score.
Intelligence & Accuracy
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Intelligence Index | 70 (reasoning), 60 (standard) | Not disclosed | Claude (likely) |
| Accuracy | 43% | Not disclosed | - |
| Hallucination Rate | 58% (4th-lowest) | Not disclosed | Claude (likely) |
Claude Opus 4.5 demonstrates strong accuracy and low hallucination rates, critical for production reliability.
Speed
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens per second | Standard | 250 | Gemini (significantly faster) |
| Speed vs predecessor | Standard | 2x faster | Gemini |
Gemini 2.0 Flash's 250 tokens/sec throughput makes it one of the fastest frontier models, ideal for real-time applications.
Context Window: Gemini's 5x Advantage
| Feature | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 1M tokens | 5x larger |
| Max Output | 64K tokens | Not disclosed | - |
Gemini's 1 million token context window enables:
- Processing entire codebases in one request
- Analyzing multiple books or long documents simultaneously
- Understanding full-length video content
- Maintaining extremely long conversation histories
Claude's 200K context is substantial and pairs with a Memory Tool for persistent storage beyond the context window.
Does Claude Opus 4.5 Have Extended Thinking?
Claude Opus 4.5 offers extended thinking with an effort parameter for controlling reasoning depth:
- Low effort: Faster responses with standard reasoning
- Medium effort: Balanced thinking for most tasks
- High effort: Deep reasoning for complex problems
This configurable reasoning gives you control over the cost-performance tradeoff on each request. Gemini 2.0 Flash doesn't offer reasoning depth control.
Multimodal Capabilities
Claude Opus 4.5:
- Input: Text, Vision ✓
- Output: Text only ✗
- Video: Not supported ✗
- Audio: Not supported ✗
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Input: Text, Image, Video, Audio ✓
- Output: Multimodal generation ✓
- Video: Native support ✓
- Audio: Supported ✓
Gemini's multimodal output generation and comprehensive input support (including video) give it unique capabilities for creative and multimedia applications.
Built-in Features
Gemini 2.0 Flash includes:
- Code execution (run code directly in the model)
- Search integration (access real-time information)
- Native tool use (built-in function calling)
- Structured outputs (JSON, XML)
Claude Opus 4.5 features:
- Memory Tool (beta) - persistent information beyond context
- Extended thinking with effort parameter
- Best prompt injection resistance
- Standard function calling
Gemini's built-in tools reduce infrastructure needs, while Claude's Memory Tool enables long-term context retention.
Security & Safety
Claude Opus 4.5 is described as "the most robustly aligned model with best prompt injection resistance of any frontier model."
This makes it more secure for:
- Production applications with untrusted inputs
- User-facing systems handling adversarial prompts
- Enterprise deployments requiring maximum security
Gemini 2.0 Flash has standard safety measures but isn't specifically highlighted for prompt injection resistance.
When to Use Each Model
Use Claude Opus 4.5 when you need:
- World's best coding: 80.9% SWE-bench for software engineering
- Autonomous agents: 66.3% OSWorld for computer use automation
- Extended reasoning: Configurable thinking depth with effort parameter
- Maximum security: Best prompt injection resistance
- Memory beyond context: Persistent information storage (beta)
- Long outputs: 64K max output tokens
- Low hallucinations: 4th-lowest hallucination rate
- Capability over cost: Best performance regardless of price
Use Gemini 2.0 Flash when you need:
- Extreme cost efficiency: 50x cheaper for high-volume applications
- Massive context: 1M token window for long documents
- Speed: 250 tokens/sec for real-time responsiveness
- Multimodal generation: Create images and other media
- Video understanding: Native video processing
- Built-in tools: Code execution and search without external APIs
- Fast iteration: Rapid development cycles
- Consumer applications: Cost-sensitive chatbots and features
Production Considerations
Claude Opus 4.5:
- Premium pricing justifies use for high-value tasks
- Best for complex software development workflows
- Ideal for autonomous agents requiring reliability
- Enterprise-grade security and alignment
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Cost structure enables consumer-scale applications
- Best for high-throughput, time-sensitive systems
- Newer model (Feb 2025) with less real-world testing
- Optimized for Google Cloud infrastructure
Availability
Claude Opus 4.5:
- Anthropic API
- Amazon Bedrock
- Google Cloud Vertex AI
- Microsoft Azure
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Google AI Studio
- Google Cloud Vertex AI
- Gemini API
Orchestrate Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash with Miniloop
Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash represent opposite ends of the capability-cost spectrum. Claude maximizes performance for critical tasks. Gemini maximizes efficiency for high-volume operations.
With Miniloop, you can build AI workflows that leverage both models strategically. Use Gemini's 1M context and 250 tokens/sec speed for initial document processing at 50x lower cost, then route critical coding tasks to Claude Opus 4.5's world-leading SWE-bench performance. Or handle customer queries with Gemini while using Claude for complex agent automation.
Miniloop lets you:
- Route high-volume tasks to Gemini (50x cost savings)
- Use Claude Opus 4.5 for critical coding and agents
- Leverage Gemini's 1M context for document processing
- Combine extended reasoning (Claude) with speed (Gemini)
- A/B test premium vs efficient models on your workloads
- Build hybrid pipelines optimized for both cost and capability
Stop choosing between maximum capability and maximum efficiency. Start building multi-model workflows with Miniloop.
Sources
- Claude Opus 4.5 - Anthropic
- Claude Opus 4.5 Benchmarks - Artificial Analysis
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Specs - Galaxy.ai
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Performance - Artificial Analysis
- Claude Opus 4.5 Pricing - LLM Stats
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.5 is better for coding excellence (world's best at 80.9% SWE-bench), autonomous agents (66.3% OSWorld), and extended reasoning. Gemini 2.0 Flash is better for cost efficiency (50x cheaper), speed (250 tokens/sec), massive context (1M vs 200K tokens), and multimodal generation.
How much cheaper is Gemini 2.0 Flash than Claude Opus 4.5?
Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens vs Claude Opus 4.5's $5, making it 50x cheaper on input and 62.5x cheaper on output ($0.40 vs $25). This dramatic cost difference makes Gemini ideal for high-volume applications.
Does Gemini 2.0 Flash have a larger context window than Claude Opus 4.5?
Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1 million token context window compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200K tokens, making it 5x larger. This allows processing much longer documents and conversations in a single request.
Is Claude Opus 4.5 the best coding model?
Yes, Claude Opus 4.5 achieves the highest SWE-bench Verified score in the world at 80.9%, making it the best model for real-world software engineering tasks. It also scores 66.3% on OSWorld for computer use automation.


