TLDR
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if you need: Extreme cost efficiency (30x cheaper), fastest speed (250 tokens/sec), massive context (1M tokens), multimodal generation, and built-in code execution/search.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need: World-class coding (82% SWE-bench), perfect math scores (100% AIME), long-horizon agents (30+ hours), superior reasoning (92% vs 90%), and extended thinking capabilities.
Budget: Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/$0.40 per million tokens) is 30x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3/$15 per million tokens).
Performance: Gemini excels in speed and cost. Claude excels in coding, reasoning depth, and agentic tasks.
Overview
Gemini 2.0 Flash, released on February 5, 2025, is Google's next-generation model optimized for speed and cost efficiency. It processes requests 2x faster than previous versions at 250 tokens/sec while supporting a massive 1 million token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.5, released on September 29, 2025, is Anthropic's flagship model designed for coding excellence and long-horizon agentic tasks. It achieves 82% on SWE-bench Verified with parallel compute and maintains focus on complex tasks for over 30 hours.
This comparison highlights fundamentally different priorities: Gemini optimizes for speed and cost, while Claude optimizes for reasoning depth and coding capabilities.
Basics: Model Specifications
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | February 5, 2025 | September 29, 2025 |
| Developer | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 1M tokens | 200K tokens |
| Max Output | Not disclosed | 8,192 tokens |
| Modalities (Input) | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image |
| Multimodal Output | ✓ Yes | ✗ Text only |
| Native Tool Use | ✓ Yes | Standard function calling |
| Code Execution | ✓ Built-in | ✗ External |
| Search Integration | ✓ Built-in | ✗ External |
| Long-horizon Focus | Standard | 30+ hours |
Want to automate your workflows?
Miniloop connects your apps and runs tasks with AI. No code required.
Pricing: Dramatic Cost Difference
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | Cost Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | $0.10 | $0.40 | Baseline |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | $3.00 | $15.00 | 30-37.5x more expensive |
For a typical task using 300,000 input tokens and generating 20,000 output tokens:
- Gemini 2.0 Flash: $0.038 per request
- Claude Sonnet 4.5: $1.20 per request
Gemini's dramatic cost advantage makes it ideal for consumer applications, chatbots, and high-volume processing where coding excellence isn't critical.
Performance: Benchmark Comparison
Coding Performance
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not disclosed | 82.0% (parallel) | Claude |
| General Coding | 90% | 77.2% (standard) | Gemini (standard) |
| Terminal-Bench | Not disclosed | 50.0% | Claude |
Claude Sonnet 4.5's 82% SWE-bench score (with parallel compute) makes it one of the world's best coding models for real-world software engineering. Gemini scores well on general coding but isn't specialized for complex software development.
Mathematical Reasoning
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025 (with tools) | Not disclosed | 100% | Claude |
| AIME 2025 (without tools) | Not disclosed | 87% | Claude |
| GPQA Diamond | Not disclosed | 83.4% | Claude |
Claude Sonnet 4.5 achieves perfect scores on AIME 2025 when allowed to use Python tools, demonstrating exceptional mathematical capabilities that Gemini doesn't match.
Reasoning Strength
| Metric | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning Score | 90% | 92% | Claude |
According to March 2025 data, Claude 3.7 (predecessor to Sonnet 4.5) scores 92% in reasoning strength compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 90%.
Speed & Throughput
| Metric | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens per second | 250 | 81-82 | Gemini (3x faster) |
| Speed advantage | 2x vs predecessor | Standard | Gemini |
Gemini 2.0 Flash's 250 tokens/sec throughput is approximately 3x faster than Claude's 81-82 tokens/sec, making it significantly better for real-time applications.
Context Window: Gemini's 5x Advantage
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1M tokens | 200K tokens | 5x larger |
Gemini's 1 million token context window allows:
- Processing entire codebases in one request
- Analyzing multiple long documents simultaneously
- Maintaining very long conversation histories
- Understanding full-length video content
Claude's 200K tokens is substantial but can't match Gemini's massive capacity.
Agentic Capabilities
Claude Sonnet 4.5 excels at long-horizon agentic tasks:
- 30+ hour task focus: Maintains context without drift
- 65% less shortcut behavior: More reliable autonomous work
- OSWorld: 61.4% score
- Tau-bench: 86.2% (Retail), 70% (Airline), 98% (Telecom)
Gemini 2.0 Flash offers:
- Built-in code execution
- Native search integration
- Fast iteration for agentic loops
For sustained, complex autonomous work, Claude's 30+ hour focus gives it an edge. For rapid agentic iterations requiring speed, Gemini wins.
Multimodal Capabilities
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Input: Text, Image, Video, Audio ✓
- Output: Multimodal generation ✓
- Video understanding: Native ✓
Claude Sonnet 4.5:
- Input: Text, Image ✓
- Output: Text only ✓
- Video: Not supported ✗
Gemini's multimodal output generation and native video support give it unique capabilities that Claude doesn't offer.
Built-in vs External Tools
Gemini 2.0 Flash includes built-in:
- Code execution (run Python directly)
- Search integration (access real-time information)
- Native tool use (built-in function calling)
- Structured outputs (JSON, XML)
Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses:
- External code execution (via APIs)
- External search (via tool use)
- Standard function calling
- Structured outputs via API parameters
Gemini's built-in capabilities reduce infrastructure complexity and latency.
When to Use Each Model
Use Gemini 2.0 Flash when you need:
- Cost efficiency: 30x cheaper for high-volume applications
- Speed: 250 tokens/sec for real-time responsiveness
- Massive context: 1M tokens for long documents and videos
- Multimodal generation: Generate images and other media
- Video understanding: Process video content natively
- Built-in tools: Code execution and search without external APIs
- Consumer applications: Cost-sensitive chatbots and features
Use Claude Sonnet 4.5 when you need:
- World-class coding: 82% SWE-bench for software engineering
- Perfect mathematics: 100% AIME 2025 with tools
- Long-horizon agents: 30+ hour sustained focus without drift
- Superior reasoning: 92% reasoning strength vs 90%
- Extended thinking: Configurable reasoning depth
- Reliable autonomy: 65% reduction in shortcut behavior
- Domain expertise: High Tau-bench scores across industries
Production Trade-offs
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Newer model (Feb 2025) with less testing
- Optimized for Google Cloud infrastructure
- Better for cost-sensitive consumer apps
- 3x faster for real-time features
Claude Sonnet 4.5:
- More mature platform (Sept 2025)
- Available across AWS, GCP, Azure
- Better for enterprise software development
- Superior for complex autonomous agents
Availability
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Google AI Studio
- Google Cloud Vertex AI
- Gemini API
Claude Sonnet 4.5:
- Anthropic API
- Claude web and mobile apps
- Amazon Bedrock
- Google Cloud Vertex AI
Orchestrate Gemini 2.0 Flash and Claude Sonnet 4.5 with Miniloop
Gemini 2.0 Flash and Claude Sonnet 4.5 represent opposite ends of the speed-vs-depth spectrum. Gemini excels at fast, cost-effective processing. Claude excels at deep reasoning and complex coding.
With Miniloop, you can build AI workflows that leverage both models' strengths. Use Gemini's 1M context and 250 tokens/sec speed for initial document processing, then route complex coding tasks to Claude's world-leading SWE-bench performance. Or use Gemini for high-volume customer queries at 30x lower cost, while using Claude for complex technical support.
Miniloop lets you:
- Route high-volume tasks to Gemini (30x cost savings)
- Use Claude for coding and mathematics (82% SWE-bench, 100% AIME)
- Leverage Gemini's 1M context for long documents
- Combine Gemini's speed with Claude's reasoning depth
- A/B test different models on your specific workloads
- Build hybrid pipelines optimized for cost and capability
Stop choosing between speed and depth. Start building multi-model workflows with Miniloop.
Sources
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 - Galaxy.ai
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Performance - Artificial Analysis
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 Model Specs - Galaxy.ai
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Claude Comparison - DocsBot
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 Benchmarks - LLM Stats
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.5?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is better for speed (3x faster at 250 tokens/sec), cost (30x cheaper at $0.10 vs $3), and massive context (1M vs 200K tokens). Claude Sonnet 4.5 is better for coding (82% SWE-bench), mathematics (100% AIME), and long-horizon agentic tasks (30+ hour focus).
How much cheaper is Gemini 2.0 Flash than Claude Sonnet 4.5?
Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens vs Claude's $3, making it 30x cheaper on input and 37.5x cheaper on output ($0.40 vs $15). This massive cost difference favors Gemini for high-volume applications.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1 million token context window compared to Claude Sonnet 4.5's 200K tokens, making it 5x larger. This allows Gemini to process much longer documents and conversations.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash for coding?
Yes, Claude Sonnet 4.5 achieves 82% on SWE-bench Verified (with parallel compute), making it one of the world's best coding models. Gemini 2.0 Flash scores approximately 90% on general coding but isn't specialized for software engineering like Claude.
