TLDR
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if you need: Extreme cost efficiency (25x cheaper), massive context windows (1M tokens), 2x faster speed, multimodal generation, and native tool use capabilities.
Choose GPT-4o if you need: Superior coding performance (90.2% HumanEval), audio I/O, proven production reliability, established ecosystem, and balanced general-purpose performance.
Budget: Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/$0.40 per million tokens) is 25x cheaper than GPT-4o ($2.50/$10 per million tokens).
Performance: Gemini 2.0 Flash excels in speed and cost efficiency. GPT-4o offers stronger coding and a more mature platform.
Overview
Gemini 2.0 Flash, released on February 5, 2025, represents Google's next-generation multimodal model optimized for speed and cost efficiency. It processes AI requests 2x faster than previous versions while cutting costs by 60%, all while supporting a massive 1 million token context window.
GPT-4o, released on May 13, 2024, is OpenAI's flagship multimodal model designed for versatility across text, vision, and audio. It balances strong performance with reasonable pricing at $2.50/$10 per million tokens.
This comparison highlights a fundamental tradeoff: Gemini 2.0 Flash prioritizes speed and cost efficiency with massive context, while GPT-4o focuses on coding excellence and proven reliability.
Basics: Model Specifications
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | February 5, 2025 | May 13, 2024 |
| Developer | OpenAI | |
| Context Window | 1M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max Output | Not disclosed | 16K tokens |
| Knowledge Cutoff | Not disclosed | October 2023 |
| Modalities (Input) | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image, Audio |
| Multimodal Output | ✓ Yes | ✗ Text only |
| Native Tool Use | ✓ Yes | Via function calling |
| Code Execution | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| Search Integration | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
Want to automate your workflows?
Miniloop connects your apps and runs tasks with AI. No code required.
Pricing: Massive Cost Difference
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | Cost Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | $0.10 | $0.40 | Baseline |
| GPT-4o | $2.50 | $10.00 | 25x more expensive |
For a typical task using 200,000 input tokens and generating 10,000 output tokens:
- Gemini 2.0 Flash: $0.024 per request
- GPT-4o: $0.60 per request
Gemini 2.0 Flash's 25x cost advantage makes it incredibly attractive for high-volume production applications, chatbots, and consumer-facing features.
Performance: Benchmark Comparison
Coding Performance
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | Not disclosed | 90.2% | GPT-4o |
| General Coding | 90% | Not disclosed | Competitive |
GPT-4o demonstrates strong coding capabilities with 90.2% on HumanEval. Gemini 2.0 Flash achieves approximately 90% in general coding ability based on March 2025 data.
General Knowledge
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU | Not disclosed | 88.7% | GPT-4o (likely) |
| GPQA | Not disclosed | 53.6% | - |
GPT-4o has publicly disclosed strong general knowledge scores. Gemini 2.0 Flash's exact benchmarks aren't widely publicized, but Google emphasizes speed over benchmark maximization.
Mathematical Reasoning
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATH | Not disclosed | 76.6% | GPT-4o (likely) |
| MGSM | Not disclosed | 90.5% | - |
GPT-4o demonstrates strong mathematical capabilities with 76.6% on the MATH benchmark.
Speed
| Metric | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens per second | 250 | Not disclosed | Gemini 2.0 Flash |
| Speed vs predecessor | 2x faster | Standard | Gemini 2.0 Flash |
Gemini 2.0 Flash's 250 tokens/sec throughput makes it one of the fastest frontier models available, ideal for real-time applications.
Context Window: Gemini's Massive Advantage
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1M tokens | 128K tokens | 8x larger |
Gemini 2.0 Flash's 1 million token context window is a game-changer for:
- Long document processing: Analyze entire books, legal documents, or codebases
- Extended conversations: Maintain context across very long interactions
- Comprehensive analysis: Process multiple documents simultaneously
- Video understanding: Analyze long-form video content in a single request
GPT-4o's 128K context window is substantial but can't match Gemini's massive capacity.
Multimodal Capabilities
Input Modalities
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Text ✓
- Images ✓
- Video ✓
- Audio ✓
GPT-4o:
- Text ✓
- Images ✓
- Audio ✓
- Video ✗
Both models support audio, but Gemini adds native video understanding.
Output Modalities
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Multimodal generation ✓ (can generate images, etc.)
GPT-4o:
- Text only (audio in specific applications)
Gemini 2.0 Flash's ability to generate multimodal outputs opens new possibilities for creative applications.
Native Capabilities
Gemini 2.0 Flash includes several built-in capabilities:
- Code execution: Run code directly within the model
- Search integration: Access real-time information
- Native tool use: Built-in function calling and tool integration
- Structured outputs: Generate JSON, XML reliably
GPT-4o offers:
- Function calling: Tool use via API
- JSON mode: Structured output support
Gemini's native capabilities reduce the need for external tooling and infrastructure.
Speed: Gemini Wins
Gemini 2.0 Flash processes requests 2x faster than previous Gemini versions and achieves 250 tokens per second, making it one of the fastest frontier models.
This speed advantage is critical for:
- Real-time chat applications: Lower latency for users
- High-throughput systems: Process more requests with fewer resources
- Streaming responses: Faster time-to-first-token
GPT-4o offers reasonable speed but can't match Gemini's 250 tokens/sec throughput.
Cost Efficiency: Gemini Dominates
Gemini 2.0 Flash cuts costs by 60% compared to previous Gemini versions and is 25x cheaper than GPT-4o.
For a high-volume application processing 1 billion input tokens and 100 million output tokens monthly:
- Gemini 2.0 Flash: $140/month
- GPT-4o: $3,500/month
The cost difference becomes dramatic at scale, potentially saving thousands of dollars monthly for large applications.
When to Use Each Model
Use Gemini 2.0 Flash when you need:
- Cost efficiency: 25x cheaper for high-volume applications
- Massive context: 1M token window for long documents
- Speed: 250 tokens/sec for real-time applications
- Multimodal generation: Generate images and other media
- Video understanding: Native video processing
- Built-in tools: Code execution, search, native function calling
- High throughput: Process many requests quickly and cheaply
Use GPT-4o when you need:
- Coding excellence: 90.2% HumanEval performance
- Audio I/O: Native audio input and output
- Proven reliability: Longer track record in production (since May 2024)
- Established ecosystem: Extensive tooling and community support
- General knowledge: Strong MMLU (88.7%) and MATH (76.6%) scores
- Conservative choice: More mature platform with known characteristics
Production Considerations
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Newer model (Feb 2025) with less real-world testing
- Optimized for Google Cloud Vertex AI
- Built-in Google Search integration
- Better for cost-sensitive consumer applications
GPT-4o:
- Proven track record since May 2024
- Extensive third-party integrations
- Available via Azure OpenAI Service
- Better for enterprise applications requiring stability
Availability
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Google AI Studio
- Google Cloud Vertex AI
- Gemini API
GPT-4o:
- OpenAI API
- Microsoft Azure OpenAI Service
- ChatGPT Plus and Team plans
Orchestrate Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o with Miniloop
Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o aren't competitors. They're complementary models optimized for different priorities: cost efficiency vs coding excellence.
With Miniloop, you can build AI workflows that strategically route between models. Use Gemini 2.0 Flash for high-volume text processing at 25x lower cost, then route complex coding tasks to GPT-4o's superior HumanEval performance. Or leverage Gemini's 1M context window for document analysis, then use GPT-4o for creative writing.
Miniloop lets you:
- Route high-volume tasks to Gemini 2.0 Flash for cost savings
- Use GPT-4o for coding and audio processing
- Leverage Gemini's 1M context for long documents
- Combine Google's speed with OpenAI's coding prowess
- A/B test models to optimize cost vs performance
- Build hybrid pipelines with different models for different steps
Stop choosing between cost and capability. Start building multi-model workflows with Miniloop.
Sources
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Specs - Galaxy.ai
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Performance Analysis - Artificial Analysis
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Pricing - LLM Stats
- GPT-4o Model Specs - Galaxy.ai
- GPT-4o mini Benchmarks - OpenAI
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash or GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is better for cost-sensitive applications (25x cheaper at $0.10 vs $2.50), speed (2x faster), and large context (1M vs 128K tokens). GPT-4o is better for coding (90.2% HumanEval), audio processing, and proven production reliability.
How much cheaper is Gemini 2.0 Flash than GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens vs GPT-4o's $2.50, making it 25x cheaper on input and 25x cheaper on output ($0.40 vs $10). This dramatic cost difference makes Gemini ideal for high-volume applications.
Does Gemini 2.0 Flash have a larger context window than GPT-4o?
Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1 million token context window compared to GPT-4o's 128K tokens, making it 8x larger. This allows Gemini to process much longer documents and conversations.
Can Gemini 2.0 Flash process audio like GPT-4o?
Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash supports audio input along with images, video, and text. It also features multimodal output generation. GPT-4o also supports audio processing with native input and output capabilities.
