Blog
Emmett Miller
Emmett Miller, Co-Founder

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4o mini: Budget Flagship Speed Showdown

January 21, 2026
Share:
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4o mini: Budget Flagship Speed Showdown

TLDR

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if you need: Massive context (1M vs 128K tokens), fastest speed (250 tokens/sec), multimodal output generation, built-in code execution/search, and slightly lower cost (1.5x cheaper).

Choose GPT-4o mini if you need: Superior coding (87.2% HumanEval), better reasoning (82% MMLU), proven reliability since July 2024, established ecosystem, and audio capabilities.

Budget: Both models are budget-friendly. Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/$0.40) is 1.5x cheaper than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/$0.60).

Performance: Gemini excels in speed and context. GPT-4o mini excels in coding and reasoning.

Overview

Gemini 2.0 Flash, released on February 5, 2025, is Google's next-generation efficient model optimized for speed and massive context. It processes requests at 250 tokens/sec with a 1 million token context window while maintaining low costs and strong performance.

GPT-4o mini, released on July 18, 2024, is OpenAI's budget-friendly flagship alternative designed to offer impressive intelligence at accessible prices. It scores 82% on MMLU and 87.2% on HumanEval while costing significantly less than GPT-4o.

Both models target developers who need strong AI performance without premium flagship pricing, but they optimize for different strengths: Gemini for speed and context, GPT-4o mini for coding and reasoning.

Basics: Model Specifications

FeatureGemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4o mini
Release DateFebruary 5, 2025July 18, 2024
DeveloperGoogleOpenAI
Context Window1M tokens128K tokens
Max OutputNot disclosed16K tokens
Knowledge CutoffNot disclosedOctober 2023
Modalities (Input)Text, Image, Video, AudioText, Image
Multimodal Output✓ Yes✗ Text only
Built-in ToolsCode execution, searchFunction calling
Speed250 tokens/secStandard

Want to automate your workflows?

Miniloop connects your apps and runs tasks with AI. No code required.

Try it free

Pricing: Similar Budget-Friendly Costs

ModelInput (per 1M tokens)Output (per 1M tokens)Cost Difference
Gemini 2.0 Flash$0.10$0.40Baseline
GPT-4o mini$0.15$0.601.5x more expensive

For a typical task using 200,000 input tokens and generating 20,000 output tokens:

  • Gemini 2.0 Flash: $0.028 per request
  • GPT-4o mini: $0.042 per request

Both models are dramatically cheaper than flagship models (10-50x less), making advanced AI accessible to developers with tight budgets. Gemini's slight edge in pricing (1.5x cheaper) adds up at scale.

Note: GPT-4o mini offers cached input pricing at $0.075 per 1M tokens, reducing costs for repeated content.

Performance: Benchmark Comparison

Reasoning & General Knowledge

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4o miniWinner
MMLUNot disclosed82.0%GPT-4o mini
General Coding90%Not disclosedCompetitive

GPT-4o mini demonstrates strong reasoning with 82% on MMLU, outperforming competitors like Gemini Flash 1.5 (77.9%) and Claude Haiku (73.8%) in the previous generation comparison.

Coding Performance

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4o miniWinner
HumanEvalNot disclosed87.2%GPT-4o mini
vs Competitors90% general87.2% vs 71.5% (Flash 1.5)GPT-4o mini

GPT-4o mini scores 87.2% on HumanEval, significantly outperforming the previous generation Gemini Flash 1.5 (71.5%). While Gemini 2.0 Flash shows improvements with 90% general coding ability, GPT-4o mini's HumanEval score is proven.

Mathematical Reasoning

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4o miniWinner
MGSMNot disclosed87.0%GPT-4o mini
vs CompetitorsNot disclosed87.0% vs 75.5% (Flash 1.5)GPT-4o mini

GPT-4o mini demonstrates strong mathematical reasoning with 87% on MGSM.

Speed & Throughput

MetricGemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4o miniWinner
Tokens per second250StandardGemini (significantly faster)
Speed vs predecessor2x fasterStandardGemini

Gemini 2.0 Flash's 250 tokens/sec throughput makes it one of the fastest models available, ideal for real-time chat applications and high-throughput systems.

Context Window: Gemini's Massive 8x Advantage

FeatureGemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4o miniDifference
Context Window1M tokens128K tokens8x larger
Max OutputNot disclosed16K tokens-

Gemini's 1 million token context window is a game-changer for:

  • Processing entire codebases in one request
  • Analyzing multiple long documents simultaneously
  • Understanding full-length video content
  • Maintaining very long conversation histories

GPT-4o mini's 128K context is substantial but can't match Gemini's massive capacity.

Multimodal Capabilities

Gemini 2.0 Flash:

  • Input: Text, Image, Video, Audio ✓
  • Output: Multimodal generation ✓
  • Video understanding: Native ✓

GPT-4o mini:

  • Input: Text, Image ✓
  • Output: Text only ✗
  • Video: Not supported ✗
  • Audio: Not supported ✗

Gemini's multimodal output generation and comprehensive input support (including video) give it unique capabilities that GPT-4o mini doesn't offer.

Built-in Features

Gemini 2.0 Flash includes:

  • Code execution (run Python directly in the model)
  • Search integration (access real-time information)
  • Native tool use (built-in function calling)
  • Structured outputs (JSON, XML)

GPT-4o mini offers:

  • Function calling for tool use
  • JSON mode for structured outputs
  • Structured Outputs for reliable formatting

Gemini's built-in code execution and search reduce infrastructure complexity and latency.

When to Use Each Model

Use Gemini 2.0 Flash when you need:

  • Massive context: 1M tokens for long documents and videos
  • Speed: 250 tokens/sec for real-time applications
  • Multimodal generation: Create images and other media
  • Video understanding: Process video content natively
  • Built-in tools: Code execution and search without external APIs
  • Slightly lower cost: 1.5x cheaper at scale
  • High throughput: Process many requests quickly

Use GPT-4o mini when you need:

  • Superior coding: 87.2% HumanEval performance
  • Better reasoning: 82% MMLU for general knowledge
  • Mathematical capabilities: 87% MGSM score
  • Proven reliability: Longer track record (July 2024 vs Feb 2025)
  • Established ecosystem: Extensive tooling and integrations
  • Conservative choice: More mature platform with known characteristics
  • OpenAI compatibility: Drop-in replacement for GPT-4o in existing apps

Production Considerations

Gemini 2.0 Flash:

  • Newer model (Feb 2025) with less real-world testing
  • Optimized for Google Cloud infrastructure
  • Better for applications requiring massive context
  • 2x faster processing for time-sensitive features

GPT-4o mini:

  • Proven in production since July 2024
  • Available via Azure OpenAI Service
  • Better for coding-heavy applications
  • More conservative choice for enterprise deployments

Availability

Gemini 2.0 Flash:

  • Google AI Studio
  • Google Cloud Vertex AI
  • Gemini API

GPT-4o mini:

  • OpenAI API
  • Microsoft Azure OpenAI Service
  • ChatGPT Plus and Team plans

Cost Comparison at Scale

For a high-volume application processing 10 billion input tokens and 1 billion output tokens monthly:

  • Gemini 2.0 Flash: $1,400/month
  • GPT-4o mini: $2,100/month

The 1.5x cost difference becomes meaningful at scale, potentially saving $700/month or $8,400/year for large applications.

Orchestrate Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o mini with Miniloop

Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o mini are both excellent budget-friendly models with different strengths. Gemini excels at speed and context, while GPT-4o mini excels at coding and reasoning.

With Miniloop, you can build AI workflows that leverage both models strategically. Use Gemini's 1M context and 250 tokens/sec speed for document processing and real-time chat, then route coding tasks to GPT-4o mini's superior HumanEval performance. Or use Gemini for multimodal generation while using GPT-4o mini for logical reasoning.

Miniloop lets you:

  • Route high-volume tasks to Gemini (1.5x cost savings)
  • Use GPT-4o mini for coding and reasoning tasks
  • Leverage Gemini's 1M context for long documents
  • Combine speed (Gemini) with coding prowess (GPT-4o mini)
  • A/B test budget models to optimize performance
  • Build hybrid pipelines with different models for different steps

Stop choosing between context and coding. Start building multi-model budget workflows with Miniloop.

Get Started with Miniloop →

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash or GPT-4o mini?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is better for massive context (1M vs 128K tokens), speed (250 tokens/sec), multimodal generation, and slightly lower cost (1.5x cheaper). GPT-4o mini is better for coding (87.2% HumanEval), reasoning (82% MMLU), and proven production reliability.

How much cheaper is Gemini 2.0 Flash than GPT-4o mini?

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens vs GPT-4o mini's $0.15, making it 1.5x cheaper on input and 1.5x cheaper on output ($0.40 vs $0.60). Both are budget-friendly flagship alternatives.

Does Gemini 2.0 Flash have a larger context window than GPT-4o mini?

Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1 million token context window compared to GPT-4o mini's 128K tokens, making it 8x larger. This allows processing much longer documents in a single request.

Which model is faster for real-time applications?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is significantly faster at 250 tokens/sec, making it 2x faster than previous Gemini versions and ideal for real-time chat, streaming, and high-throughput applications. GPT-4o mini has standard speed.

Related Templates

Automate workflows related to this topic with ready-to-use templates.

View all templates
PagerDutyDatadogOpenAISlack

Enrich PagerDuty incidents with AI analysis and Datadog context

Automatically gather context for incidents with AI. Pull Datadog metrics, analyze patterns, and deliver enriched alerts to Slack for faster response.

Related Articles

Explore more insights and guides on automation and AI.

View all articles