TLDR
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if you need: Massive context (1M vs 128K tokens), fastest speed (250 tokens/sec), multimodal output generation, built-in code execution/search, and slightly lower cost (1.5x cheaper).
Choose GPT-4o mini if you need: Superior coding (87.2% HumanEval), better reasoning (82% MMLU), proven reliability since July 2024, established ecosystem, and audio capabilities.
Budget: Both models are budget-friendly. Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/$0.40) is 1.5x cheaper than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/$0.60).
Performance: Gemini excels in speed and context. GPT-4o mini excels in coding and reasoning.
Overview
Gemini 2.0 Flash, released on February 5, 2025, is Google's next-generation efficient model optimized for speed and massive context. It processes requests at 250 tokens/sec with a 1 million token context window while maintaining low costs and strong performance.
GPT-4o mini, released on July 18, 2024, is OpenAI's budget-friendly flagship alternative designed to offer impressive intelligence at accessible prices. It scores 82% on MMLU and 87.2% on HumanEval while costing significantly less than GPT-4o.
Both models target developers who need strong AI performance without premium flagship pricing, but they optimize for different strengths: Gemini for speed and context, GPT-4o mini for coding and reasoning.
Basics: Model Specifications
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | February 5, 2025 | July 18, 2024 |
| Developer | OpenAI | |
| Context Window | 1M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max Output | Not disclosed | 16K tokens |
| Knowledge Cutoff | Not disclosed | October 2023 |
| Modalities (Input) | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image |
| Multimodal Output | ✓ Yes | ✗ Text only |
| Built-in Tools | Code execution, search | Function calling |
| Speed | 250 tokens/sec | Standard |
Want to automate your workflows?
Miniloop connects your apps and runs tasks with AI. No code required.
Pricing: Similar Budget-Friendly Costs
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | Cost Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | $0.10 | $0.40 | Baseline |
| GPT-4o mini | $0.15 | $0.60 | 1.5x more expensive |
For a typical task using 200,000 input tokens and generating 20,000 output tokens:
- Gemini 2.0 Flash: $0.028 per request
- GPT-4o mini: $0.042 per request
Both models are dramatically cheaper than flagship models (10-50x less), making advanced AI accessible to developers with tight budgets. Gemini's slight edge in pricing (1.5x cheaper) adds up at scale.
Note: GPT-4o mini offers cached input pricing at $0.075 per 1M tokens, reducing costs for repeated content.
Performance: Benchmark Comparison
Reasoning & General Knowledge
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU | Not disclosed | 82.0% | GPT-4o mini |
| General Coding | 90% | Not disclosed | Competitive |
GPT-4o mini demonstrates strong reasoning with 82% on MMLU, outperforming competitors like Gemini Flash 1.5 (77.9%) and Claude Haiku (73.8%) in the previous generation comparison.
Coding Performance
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | Not disclosed | 87.2% | GPT-4o mini |
| vs Competitors | 90% general | 87.2% vs 71.5% (Flash 1.5) | GPT-4o mini |
GPT-4o mini scores 87.2% on HumanEval, significantly outperforming the previous generation Gemini Flash 1.5 (71.5%). While Gemini 2.0 Flash shows improvements with 90% general coding ability, GPT-4o mini's HumanEval score is proven.
Mathematical Reasoning
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGSM | Not disclosed | 87.0% | GPT-4o mini |
| vs Competitors | Not disclosed | 87.0% vs 75.5% (Flash 1.5) | GPT-4o mini |
GPT-4o mini demonstrates strong mathematical reasoning with 87% on MGSM.
Speed & Throughput
| Metric | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens per second | 250 | Standard | Gemini (significantly faster) |
| Speed vs predecessor | 2x faster | Standard | Gemini |
Gemini 2.0 Flash's 250 tokens/sec throughput makes it one of the fastest models available, ideal for real-time chat applications and high-throughput systems.
Context Window: Gemini's Massive 8x Advantage
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1M tokens | 128K tokens | 8x larger |
| Max Output | Not disclosed | 16K tokens | - |
Gemini's 1 million token context window is a game-changer for:
- Processing entire codebases in one request
- Analyzing multiple long documents simultaneously
- Understanding full-length video content
- Maintaining very long conversation histories
GPT-4o mini's 128K context is substantial but can't match Gemini's massive capacity.
Multimodal Capabilities
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Input: Text, Image, Video, Audio ✓
- Output: Multimodal generation ✓
- Video understanding: Native ✓
GPT-4o mini:
- Input: Text, Image ✓
- Output: Text only ✗
- Video: Not supported ✗
- Audio: Not supported ✗
Gemini's multimodal output generation and comprehensive input support (including video) give it unique capabilities that GPT-4o mini doesn't offer.
Built-in Features
Gemini 2.0 Flash includes:
- Code execution (run Python directly in the model)
- Search integration (access real-time information)
- Native tool use (built-in function calling)
- Structured outputs (JSON, XML)
GPT-4o mini offers:
- Function calling for tool use
- JSON mode for structured outputs
- Structured Outputs for reliable formatting
Gemini's built-in code execution and search reduce infrastructure complexity and latency.
When to Use Each Model
Use Gemini 2.0 Flash when you need:
- Massive context: 1M tokens for long documents and videos
- Speed: 250 tokens/sec for real-time applications
- Multimodal generation: Create images and other media
- Video understanding: Process video content natively
- Built-in tools: Code execution and search without external APIs
- Slightly lower cost: 1.5x cheaper at scale
- High throughput: Process many requests quickly
Use GPT-4o mini when you need:
- Superior coding: 87.2% HumanEval performance
- Better reasoning: 82% MMLU for general knowledge
- Mathematical capabilities: 87% MGSM score
- Proven reliability: Longer track record (July 2024 vs Feb 2025)
- Established ecosystem: Extensive tooling and integrations
- Conservative choice: More mature platform with known characteristics
- OpenAI compatibility: Drop-in replacement for GPT-4o in existing apps
Production Considerations
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Newer model (Feb 2025) with less real-world testing
- Optimized for Google Cloud infrastructure
- Better for applications requiring massive context
- 2x faster processing for time-sensitive features
GPT-4o mini:
- Proven in production since July 2024
- Available via Azure OpenAI Service
- Better for coding-heavy applications
- More conservative choice for enterprise deployments
Availability
Gemini 2.0 Flash:
- Google AI Studio
- Google Cloud Vertex AI
- Gemini API
GPT-4o mini:
- OpenAI API
- Microsoft Azure OpenAI Service
- ChatGPT Plus and Team plans
Cost Comparison at Scale
For a high-volume application processing 10 billion input tokens and 1 billion output tokens monthly:
- Gemini 2.0 Flash: $1,400/month
- GPT-4o mini: $2,100/month
The 1.5x cost difference becomes meaningful at scale, potentially saving $700/month or $8,400/year for large applications.
Orchestrate Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o mini with Miniloop
Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o mini are both excellent budget-friendly models with different strengths. Gemini excels at speed and context, while GPT-4o mini excels at coding and reasoning.
With Miniloop, you can build AI workflows that leverage both models strategically. Use Gemini's 1M context and 250 tokens/sec speed for document processing and real-time chat, then route coding tasks to GPT-4o mini's superior HumanEval performance. Or use Gemini for multimodal generation while using GPT-4o mini for logical reasoning.
Miniloop lets you:
- Route high-volume tasks to Gemini (1.5x cost savings)
- Use GPT-4o mini for coding and reasoning tasks
- Leverage Gemini's 1M context for long documents
- Combine speed (Gemini) with coding prowess (GPT-4o mini)
- A/B test budget models to optimize performance
- Build hybrid pipelines with different models for different steps
Stop choosing between context and coding. Start building multi-model budget workflows with Miniloop.
Sources
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Specs - Galaxy.ai
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Performance - Artificial Analysis
- GPT-4o mini - OpenAI
- GPT-4o mini Performance Analysis - Artificial Analysis
- GPT-4o mini Pricing - LLM Stats
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash or GPT-4o mini?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is better for massive context (1M vs 128K tokens), speed (250 tokens/sec), multimodal generation, and slightly lower cost (1.5x cheaper). GPT-4o mini is better for coding (87.2% HumanEval), reasoning (82% MMLU), and proven production reliability.
How much cheaper is Gemini 2.0 Flash than GPT-4o mini?
Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens vs GPT-4o mini's $0.15, making it 1.5x cheaper on input and 1.5x cheaper on output ($0.40 vs $0.60). Both are budget-friendly flagship alternatives.
Does Gemini 2.0 Flash have a larger context window than GPT-4o mini?
Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1 million token context window compared to GPT-4o mini's 128K tokens, making it 8x larger. This allows processing much longer documents in a single request.
Which model is faster for real-time applications?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is significantly faster at 250 tokens/sec, making it 2x faster than previous Gemini versions and ideal for real-time chat, streaming, and high-throughput applications. GPT-4o mini has standard speed.


