Best IFTTT Alternatives in 2026: Compare Top Automation Tools

IFTTT pioneered simple automation. Connect apps with basic trigger-action logic: "If this happens, then do that." For personal automation and smart home control, it's been the go-to for years.

But IFTTT has limits. The free tier caps you at 2 applets. Business features are locked behind paid plans. And the "simple" approach falls apart when workflows get complex.

If you've outgrown IFTTT, here's what actually works for different use cases.

Why People Look for IFTTT Alternatives

Three main reasons:

Free tier limits. IFTTT's free plan allows only 2 applets. If you need more, you're paying $2.99-8.99/month for what used to be free (see our IFTTT pricing breakdown for details).

Simplicity becomes a constraint. IFTTT handles "if X then Y" well. Multi-step logic, conditional branching, and data transformation require more capable tools.

Business needs differ. IFTTT was built for personal automation. Business workflows need more integrations, team features, and reliability.

IFTTT Alternatives Comparison Table 2026

For AI-Generated Workflows: Miniloop

Best for: Teams who want AI to build data workflows

IFTTT connects apps with simple rules. Miniloop takes a different approach: you describe what you want, and AI generates the workflow.

Instead of configuring triggers and actions, you say "enrich this CSV of leads with company data and score by employee count." Miniloop writes Python code, you review it, and run it in secure sandboxes.

Strengths

• AI builds workflows. Describe outcomes, not steps.
• Visible code. Every workflow is Python you can read.
• Data processing focus. Built for CSVs, transformation, enrichment.
• No applet limits. No artificial caps on what you can create.

Weaknesses

• Not for simple personal automation. Overkill for "smart light triggers."
• Code review required. You should understand what the AI generated.
• Fewer consumer integrations. Built for data work, not smart home.

Pricing

Free, $29/mo+

When to choose Miniloop over IFTTT

• Your needs are data processing, not personal automation
• You want AI to generate workflows instead of configuring them
• You want to see exactly what code is running
• You've outgrown simple trigger-action logic

When to skip it

• You want simple smart home automation
• Personal triggers (save photos, post to social) are your main use case
• You prefer visual configuration over reviewing code
• You need consumer device integrations

For Maximum Business Integrations: Zapier

Best for: Business users who need the widest app coverage

Zapier is what IFTTT would be if it grew up for business. 8,000+ integrations, multi-step workflows, conditional logic. It's the default choice for connecting business apps.

Strengths

• 8,000+ integrations. The largest app library.
• Multi-step workflows. Chain actions together.
• Conditional logic. Filters and paths for complex flows.
• Reliable. Battle-tested since 2011.

Weaknesses

• Task-based pricing. Each action costs a task. Gets expensive.
• AI feels bolted on. Not AI-native.
• Learning curve. More complex than IFTTT.

Pricing

Free tier with 100 tasks. Professional starts at $29.99/month for 750 tasks.

When to choose Zapier over IFTTT

• You need business app integrations
• Multi-step workflows are essential
• You've outgrown IFTTT's 2-applet limit
• Reliability matters more than cost

For Visual Data Transformation: Make

Best for: Users who need complex data handling at lower cost

Make (formerly Integromat) offers visual building with real data transformation power. Filters, routers, aggregators, conditional logic. And it costs less than Zapier.

Strengths

• 2,000+ integrations. Solid business app coverage.
• Powerful data handling. Transform, filter, route visually.
• Lower prices. $10.59/month for 10,000 operations.
• Visual scenarios. See exactly how data flows.

Weaknesses

• Learning curve. More complex than IFTTT or Zapier. Takes time to master.
• Not for personal automation. Business-focused.
• Occasional stability issues. Some users report intermittent problems.

Pricing

Free tier available. Paid plans start at $10.59/month for 10,000 operations.

When to choose Make over IFTTT

• You need complex data transformation
• Budget matters (Make is cheaper than Zapier)
• Visual workflow building appeals to you
• Business automation, not personal

For Self-Hosting: n8n

Best for: Technical users who want control and unlimited executions

n8n is open-source and self-hostable. Run unlimited workflows on your infrastructure without per-task pricing. Full control over data and execution.

Strengths

• Self-host for free. No execution limits.
• Open-source. Full code access.
• Powerful. Code nodes, complex logic, API access.
• AI workflow building. Built-in AI capabilities.

Weaknesses

• Requires infrastructure. Self-hosting needs engineering.
• Steep learning curve. More complex than IFTTT.
• Not for casual users. Overkill for personal automation.

Pricing

Self-hosted is free. Cloud starts at $20/month.

When to choose n8n over IFTTT

• You want unlimited executions through self-hosting
• You have technical resources
• Data privacy and control matter
• You need more power than IFTTT offers

For Budget Business Automation: Pabbly Connect

Best for: Cost-conscious businesses wanting flat pricing

Pabbly Connect offers 2,000+ integrations with a key differentiator: flat pricing without task limits. Pay a fixed monthly fee, run unlimited workflows.

Strengths

• Flat pricing. No per-task charges.
• 2,000+ integrations. Good app coverage.
• Unlimited workflows. No artificial caps.
• Email parser. Extract data from emails.

Weaknesses

• Less polished. Interface isn't as refined.
• Smaller ecosystem. Fewer integrations than Zapier.
• Limited advanced features. Basic compared to Make or n8n.

Pricing

Starts at $14/month with unlimited workflows.

When to choose Pabbly over IFTTT

• Budget is primary concern
• You want flat pricing without task limits
• Basic automation is sufficient
• You don't need the most polished interface

For iOS/Mac Device Automation: Apple Shortcuts

Best for: Apple users who want device-level automation

Apple Shortcuts (formerly Workflow) is the native automation tool for iOS and macOS. Deep integration with Apple apps and services, voice activation via Siri.

Strengths

• Free. No cost for Apple users.
• Native integration. Works with all Apple apps.
• Voice activation. Trigger via Siri.
• Device-level access. Deeper than IFTTT on Apple devices.

Weaknesses

• Apple only. No Android, Windows, or web.
• Limited third-party apps. Fewer integrations than IFTTT.
• Device-focused. Not for web service automation.

Pricing

Free (included with iOS/macOS).

When to choose Apple Shortcuts over IFTTT

• You're fully in the Apple ecosystem
• Device-level automation is the focus
• You want Siri voice integration
• Third-party web services aren't important

For Android Device Automation: Tasker

Best for: Android users who want deep device control

Tasker is the power-user automation tool for Android. More capable than IFTTT for device-level automation, with location triggers, app-specific actions, and system-level access.

Strengths

• Deep Android integration. System-level access.
• Location-based triggers. Powerful geofencing.
• One-time purchase. No subscription.
• Highly customizable. Nearly unlimited possibilities.

Weaknesses

• Android only. No iOS or web.
• Steep learning curve. Complex to master.
• No web service focus. Device automation only.

Pricing

One-time purchase (~$3.49).

When to choose Tasker over IFTTT

• You're on Android and want deep device control
• You prefer one-time purchase over subscription
• You're comfortable with complexity
• Device automation is more important than web services

Which Alternative Should You Choose?

"I want AI to generate my workflows." → Miniloop. Describe what you need, get readable code.

"I need the most app integrations for business." → Zapier. 8,000+ apps, reliable and established.

"I need complex data transformation at lower cost." → Make. Visual building with powerful routing.

"I want to self-host with unlimited executions." → n8n. Open-source, full control.

"I want flat pricing without task limits." → Pabbly Connect. Fixed monthly fee, unlimited workflows.

"I want free device automation on Apple." → Apple Shortcuts. Native, free, Siri-enabled.

"I want deep Android device control." → Tasker. Power-user automation, one-time purchase.

Which IFTTT Alternative Should You Choose?

IFTTT pioneered simple automation, and it still works for basic personal use cases. Smart home triggers, simple app connections, casual automation.

But the free tier limits push you toward paid plans for what used to be free. And as soon as you need multi-step workflows, data transformation, or business-grade features, IFTTT hits its ceiling.

The right alternative depends on your use case. Personal device automation? Apple Shortcuts or Tasker. Business app integration? Zapier or Make. AI-generated data workflows? Miniloop. Self-hosted power? n8n.

Pick the tool that matches what you actually need, not the one you've always used.

FAQs About IFTTT Alternatives

Is IFTTT still free?

IFTTT's free tier allows only 2 applets, making it essentially a demo. For practical use, you need Pro ($2.99/month for 20 applets) or Pro+ ($8.99/month for unlimited applets). The free tier used to be much more generous.

What's the best free IFTTT alternative?

Apple Shortcuts is the best free alternative for iOS/Mac users. n8n self-hosted is completely free with unlimited executions. Zapier, Make, and Pabbly all offer free tiers with usage limits. Tasker ($3.49 one-time) is best for Android device automation.

What's the best IFTTT alternative for business?

Zapier is the best IFTTT alternative for business with 8,000+ integrations and multi-step workflows. Make offers better value at $10.59/month with 2,000+ integrations. Miniloop is best for AI-generated data workflows where you need to see the code.

Can I migrate my IFTTT applets to another tool?

No direct migration path exists between platforms. Each automation tool uses its own format. You'll need to rebuild your logic in the new tool, but the concepts translate. Most IFTTT applets are simple enough to recreate in minutes.

Which IFTTT alternative has the most integrations?

Zapier has the most integrations at 8,000+ apps. Make has 2,000+. n8n has 400+. IFTTT has about 1,000, with strength in smart home and IoT devices rather than business apps.