TL;DR: Miniloop for AI-generated workflows, Zapier for simplicity (8,000+ integrations), n8n for self-hosting, Pipedream for developers. Make.com is powerful but manual. This guide covers 9 alternatives based on what you actually need.
9 Best Make.com Alternatives for AI Automation in 2026
Last updated: February 2026
Make.com (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform with 2,000+ integrations and powerful data transformation. The best alternatives include Miniloop (AI-generated workflows), Zapier (8,000+ integrations), n8n (free self-hosted), and Pipedream (code-first automation).
Make.com is powerful. The visual scenario builder, data transformation capabilities, and branching logic make it one of the most capable automation tools available. But it's not for everyone.
The learning curve is steep. Operation-based pricing can surprise you at scale. And if you want AI to help build your workflows instead of dragging modules manually, Make doesn't offer that.
This guide covers 9 Make.com alternatives in 2026, organized by what you're trying to accomplish.
Make.com Alternatives Comparison Table 2026
| Platform | Best For | Starting Price | G2 Rating | Key Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miniloop | AI-generated workflows | Free, $29/mo+ | 4.8/5 | Describe workflows in plain language |
| Zapier | Simple automations | $29.99/mo | 4.5/5 | 8,000+ integrations |
| n8n | Self-hosting, control | Free, $20/mo | 4.6/5 | Open-source, unlimited self-hosted |
| Pipedream | Developer workflows | Free, $45/mo+ | 4.6/5 | Real code with managed infra |
| Relay.app | Human-in-the-loop | $27/mo+ | 4.5/5 | Approval workflows |
| Lindy AI | AI agent assistants | $49/mo+ | 4.4/5 | Pre-built AI agents |
| Stack AI | Enterprise AI workflows | Custom | 4.5/5 | LLM orchestration |
| Integrately | Budget automation | $19.99/mo | 4.5/5 | One-click automations |
| IFTTT | Personal automation | $2.99/mo | 4.2/5 | Simple, mobile-focused |
Who Is This Guide For?
Different alternatives work for different people:
Non-technical founders and operators: Start with Zapier (simplest) or Miniloop (AI-assisted)
Technical users who want control: Consider n8n (open-source) or Pipedream (code-first)
Teams needing human oversight: Look at Relay.app
Teams building AI agents: Explore Miniloop, Lindy AI, or Stack AI
Budget-conscious users: IFTTT or Integrately
Why People Look for Make.com Alternatives
Before diving into options, here's what drives people away from Make:
The learning curve is steep
Make is powerful, but that power comes with complexity. The scenario builder, data mapping, and error handling take time to master. Non-technical users often struggle to get productive.
Operation-based pricing surprises at scale
Make charges per operation. A single scenario can use dozens of operations per run. High-frequency workflows get expensive fast. See our Make.com pricing breakdown for real-world cost scenarios.
Manual workflow building is slow
Every Make scenario starts from scratch. You drag modules, configure each connection, map data fields, debug issues. There's no AI assistance to generate workflows or suggest improvements.
Complex scenarios are hard to debug
When something breaks in a 20-module scenario, finding the issue takes time. Make's error messages help, but debugging complex workflows is never fun.
If any of these resonate, here are your options.
Want to automate your workflows?
Miniloop connects your apps and runs tasks with AI. No code required.
1. Miniloop
Best for: Teams who want AI to build workflows instead of building them manually
G2 Rating: 4.8/5 | Starting price: Free, then $29/mo
Most automation tools, Make included, assume you know exactly what to build. You drag modules, configure connections, debug issues. Miniloop takes a different approach: describe your workflow in plain language, and AI generates it.
How Miniloop works
- Describe what you want: "Take this CSV of leads, enrich each with LinkedIn data, score by company size, push qualified leads to HubSpot"
- AI generates the workflow: Miniloop creates Python code for each step
- Review and run: The code is readable, not a black box
- Save as repeatable: Turn working tasks into scheduled workflows
Why teams choose Miniloop over Make
- No manual building. You describe outcomes, not configure modules.
- Readable code. Every workflow is Python you can inspect and modify.
- AI-native. Built for workflows that involve AI reasoning, not just data movement.
- No operation limits. Different pricing model than Make.
Who Miniloop is for
- Startup founders automating GTM (lead routing, content publishing, outbound)
- Operators who want automation without learning visual builders
- Teams tired of copy-pasting between ChatGPT and other tools
- Anyone who'd rather describe what they need than drag modules
Who should skip Miniloop
- Teams needing 2,000+ pre-built app integrations
- Pure trigger-action workflows without AI reasoning
- Users who specifically want visual drag-and-drop building
Pricing
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Limited workflows |
| Pro | $29/mo | Unlimited workflows |
| Team | Custom | Collaboration features |
What users say
"I described my lead enrichment workflow and had it running in 10 minutes. Would have taken me 2 hours in Make." — Startup founder
"Finally, automation that doesn't require me to become a workflow engineer." — Marketing operator
2. Zapier
Best for: Non-technical users who need things to just work
G2 Rating: 4.5/5 | Starting price: $29.99/mo (750 tasks)
Zapier is the default choice for a reason. It connects to everything, the interface is intuitive, and it rarely breaks. If your workflows are straightforward, Zapier handles it with minimal friction.
Why teams choose Zapier over Make
- 8,000+ integrations. The largest app library by far.
- Dead simple. Pick a trigger, pick an action, done.
- Reliable. Running since 2011. Battle-tested.
- Great templates. Pre-built Zaps for common use cases.
Who Zapier is for
- Non-technical users who need quick app connections
- Teams with straightforward trigger-action workflows
- Anyone who values simplicity over power
- Users okay paying premium for ease of use
Limitations
- Limited data transformation. Complex logic gets awkward fast.
- Expensive at scale. Task-based pricing adds up.
- No code access. Can't see or modify what's happening.
- Multi-step costs more. Advanced features require higher tiers.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Tasks/month |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 |
| Starter | $29.99 | 750 |
| Professional | $73.50 | 2,000 |
| Team | $103.50 | 2,000 (shared) |
What users say
"Zapier just works. I've been using it for 5 years without issues." — SaaS operator
"Gets expensive when you scale, but nothing else is as easy to set up." — Startup founder
3. n8n
Best for: Technical teams who want to own their infrastructure
G2 Rating: 4.6/5 | Starting price: Free (self-hosted), $20/mo (cloud)
n8n is open-source and self-hostable. If you have engineering resources and want unlimited executions without per-operation pricing, n8n delivers.
Why teams choose n8n over Make
- Self-host for free. No execution limits when you run it yourself.
- Open-source. Fork it, modify it, extend it.
- Powerful code nodes. Write JavaScript when visual modules aren't enough.
- Active community. Good documentation, lots of examples.
Who n8n is for
- Technical teams with DevOps resources
- Organizations wanting to own their automation infrastructure
- Anyone needing unlimited executions without cloud pricing
- Teams comfortable with self-hosting complexity
Limitations
- Steep learning curve. More complex than Make.
- Self-hosting overhead. Servers, maintenance, scaling.
- Cloud pricing has limits. Execution caps apply to hosted plans.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Executions |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted | Free | Unlimited |
| Starter | $20/mo | 2,500 |
| Pro | $50/mo | 10,000 |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited |
What users say
"n8n gives us complete control. Worth the setup overhead." — DevOps engineer
"We switched from Make to self-hosted n8n. No more operation counting." — Startup CTO
4. Pipedream
Best for: Developers who want code control with managed infrastructure
G2 Rating: 4.6/5 | Starting price: Free, then $45/mo
Pipedream is for developers who think in code, not flowcharts. Write JavaScript, Python, Go, or Bash. Pipedream manages the infrastructure.
Why developers choose Pipedream over Make
- Real code. Write actual functions, not visual approximations.
- Multiple languages. JS, Python, Go, Bash.
- Managed infrastructure. You write code, they run it.
- Great debugging. Live execution, variable inspection.
Who Pipedream is for
- Developers who prefer code over visual builders
- Teams needing custom API integrations
- Anyone who wants managed infrastructure without self-hosting
- Users who need real debugging capabilities
Limitations
- Requires coding. Not for non-technical users.
- Less polished UI. Functional interface, not visual builder.
- Smaller app library. Fewer pre-built integrations.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Credits/month |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 |
| Basic | $45 | 2,000 |
| Advanced | $139 | 10,000 |
What users say
"Finally, automation for developers. I can write real code." — Backend engineer
"Pipedream is what I wished Make was for API work." — Full-stack developer
5. Relay.app
Best for: Teams who need approval workflows and human oversight
G2 Rating: 4.5/5 | Starting price: $27/mo
Relay.app focuses on something most automation tools ignore: human oversight. Insert approval steps, require sign-off before actions execute, collaborate on workflows as a team.
Why teams choose Relay.app over Make
- Built-in approvals. Native human-in-the-loop steps.
- Team collaboration. Multiple people can work on workflows.
- Clean interface. Modern, intuitive design.
- AI features. Built-in AI steps for text processing.
Who Relay.app is for
- Teams needing approval workflows
- Organizations where human oversight matters
- Anyone who values team collaboration features
- Users wanting a modern, clean interface
Limitations
- Smaller integration library. Not as extensive as Make or Zapier.
- Less data transformation. Not as powerful for complex logic.
- Newer platform. Less mature than established players.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Runs/month |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $27 | 1,000 |
| Team | $57 | 5,000 |
| Business | Custom | Unlimited |
What users say
"Relay's approval workflows are exactly what we needed. Make couldn't do this." — Operations manager
"The team collaboration features alone were worth switching." — Marketing lead
6. Lindy AI
Best for: Teams who want pre-built AI agents for common tasks
G2 Rating: 4.4/5 | Starting price: $49/mo
Lindy AI focuses on AI agents rather than traditional workflows. Pre-built agents handle tasks like email management, meeting scheduling, and customer support.
Why teams choose Lindy AI over Make
- Pre-built AI agents. Don't build from scratch, use templates.
- Natural language control. Tell agents what to do in plain English.
- Meeting and email focus. Strong for calendar and inbox automation.
- No workflow building. Agents figure out the steps.
Who Lindy AI is for
- Teams automating meetings, emails, and scheduling
- Users who want AI agents without building workflows
- Anyone tired of manually managing calendars and inboxes
- Non-technical users who want AI assistance
Limitations
- Narrower use cases. Best for email/meeting automation.
- Less customization. Pre-built agents have limits.
- Higher starting price. $49/mo minimum.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Credits |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $49/mo | 3,000 |
| Business | $99/mo | 10,000 |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited |
What users say
"Lindy handles my meeting scheduling better than I did." — Founder
"Great for what it does, but limited if you need custom workflows." — Operations lead
7. Stack AI
Best for: Enterprise teams building AI-powered workflows
G2 Rating: 4.5/5 | Starting price: Custom (enterprise)
Stack AI is an enterprise platform for building AI workflows. It's designed for organizations that need LLM orchestration, data processing, and enterprise security.
Why enterprises choose Stack AI over Make
- LLM orchestration. Connect multiple AI models in workflows.
- Enterprise security. SOC 2, SSO, audit logs.
- Data processing. Handle large datasets with AI.
- Visual builder. Drag-and-drop with AI capabilities.
Who Stack AI is for
- Enterprise teams building AI applications
- Organizations with compliance requirements
- Teams needing LLM orchestration across workflows
- Anyone wanting enterprise-grade AI automation
Limitations
- Enterprise pricing. Not for small teams.
- Complex setup. Requires planning and resources.
- Overkill for simple workflows. Built for AI-heavy use cases.
What users say
"Stack AI handles our AI pipeline better than anything we built internally." — Enterprise architect
"The enterprise features justified the cost for us." — IT director
8. Integrately
Best for: Budget-conscious teams who want quick automations
G2 Rating: 4.5/5 | Starting price: $19.99/mo
Integrately focuses on simplicity and affordability. One-click automations for common use cases, with pricing that undercuts most competitors.
Why teams choose Integrately over Make
- One-click automations. Pre-built workflows you just activate.
- Affordable. $19.99/mo for 10,000 tasks.
- Simple interface. Less overwhelming than Make.
- Good integration library. 1,200+ apps.
Who Integrately is for
- Budget-conscious teams
- Users who want quick setup without learning curve
- Anyone who needs simple automations at scale
- Teams moving from Zapier to save money
Limitations
- Less powerful. Not as flexible as Make for complex logic.
- Limited customization. Pre-built automations have constraints.
- Smaller community. Less documentation and examples.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Tasks/month |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $19.99 | 10,000 |
| Professional | $39 | 30,000 |
| Growth | $99 | 150,000 |
What users say
"Integrately does 80% of what Make does at a fraction of the cost." — Small business owner
"The one-click automations saved us hours of setup time." — Marketing manager
9. IFTTT
Best for: Personal automation on a tight budget
G2 Rating: 4.2/5 | Starting price: $2.99/mo
IFTTT (If This Then That) is the budget option. It's simpler than Make, with fewer features, but at $2.99/month it's hard to beat on price for personal use.
Why individuals choose IFTTT over Make
- Cheap. $2.99/month for Pro.
- Simple. Very easy to set up basic automations.
- Mobile app. Great for phone-based workflows.
- Smart home focus. Excellent IoT integrations.
Who IFTTT is for
- Individuals with simple automation needs
- Smart home enthusiasts
- Anyone on a tight budget
- Users who need mobile-first automation
Limitations
- Very limited. Not suitable for business workflows.
- Basic logic only. No complex branching or transformation.
- Slow execution. Not instant for many triggers.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Applets |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 2 |
| Pro | $2.99/mo | 20 |
| Pro+ | $14.99/mo | Unlimited |
How to Choose the Right Make Alternative
Decision framework by role
"I'm a non-technical founder or operator." Zapier for simplicity, Miniloop for AI-assisted automation
"I'm a developer who wants code control." Pipedream for managed infra, n8n for self-hosted
"I need human approval steps in my workflows." Relay.app
"I want AI agents, not manual workflows." Miniloop for custom, Lindy AI for pre-built
"I'm on a tight budget." Integrately or IFTTT
Decision framework by need
| If you need... | Choose... |
|---|---|
| AI to build workflows for you | Miniloop |
| Maximum integrations (8,000+) | Zapier |
| Self-hosting and control | n8n |
| Code control with managed infra | Pipedream |
| Human approval workflows | Relay.app |
| Pre-built AI agents | Lindy AI |
| Enterprise AI orchestration | Stack AI |
| Budget automation at scale | Integrately |
| Cheap personal automation | IFTTT |
The Bigger Picture: AI Is Changing Automation
The automation landscape is shifting. Make.com represents the previous generation: powerful visual builders where you manually construct every workflow, module by module.
The new generation is AI-assisted. Instead of learning complex interfaces and configuring each step, you describe what you want and let AI figure out the implementation.
That's the approach Miniloop, Lindy AI, and Stack AI are taking. Whether you stick with Make's visual power or move to AI-assisted automation depends on what you value: visual control or speed of implementation.
The era of dragging modules and debugging data mappings manually is ending. The question is when, not if.
FAQs About Make.com Alternatives
What is the best Make.com alternative?
The best Make.com alternative depends on your needs. Miniloop is best for AI-generated workflows without manual building. Zapier is best for non-technical users with 8,000+ integrations. n8n is best for self-hosting. Pipedream is best for developers who want code control.
Is there a free Make.com alternative?
Yes. n8n self-hosted is completely free with unlimited executions. Zapier, Pipedream, and Miniloop offer free tiers with usage limits. IFTTT has a free tier for simple automations.
What is cheaper than Make.com?
IFTTT is cheapest at $2.99/month but very limited. n8n self-hosted is free. Integrately offers 10,000 tasks for $19.99/month. For comparable features to Make, most alternatives are similarly priced.
Can I migrate Make scenarios to another platform?
No direct migration path exists. Each platform uses its own workflow format. You need to rebuild scenarios manually. Simple workflows migrate in minutes. Complex scenarios with many modules take longer.
Which Make alternative has the most integrations?
Zapier has the most integrations at 8,000+ apps. Make has 2,000+. Integrately has 1,200+. n8n has 400+. Miniloop takes a different approach where workflows are Python code that can call any API directly.
Is Make.com better than Zapier?
Make is better for complex data transformation and visual workflow building. Zapier is better for simplicity and integration breadth. Make costs less per operation. Zapier is easier to learn. Choose Make for power, Zapier for simplicity.
Related Reading
- Make.com Pricing in 2026: Complete Breakdown
- Best Zapier Alternatives in 2026
- n8n Pricing in 2026
- What Is AI Automation?
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best Make.com alternative?
The best Make.com alternative depends on your needs. Miniloop is best for AI-generated workflows without manual building. Zapier is best for non-technical users with 8,000+ integrations. n8n is best for self-hosting. Pipedream is best for developers who want code control.
Is there a free Make.com alternative?
Yes. n8n self-hosted is completely free with unlimited executions. Zapier, Pipedream, and Miniloop offer free tiers with usage limits. IFTTT has a free tier for simple automations.
What is cheaper than Make.com?
IFTTT is cheapest at $2.99/month but very limited. n8n self-hosted is free. For comparable features, n8n Cloud starts at $20/month vs Make's $10.59/month, but n8n has fewer execution limits at higher tiers.
Can I migrate Make scenarios to another platform?
No direct migration path exists. Each platform uses its own workflow format. You need to rebuild scenarios manually. Simple workflows migrate in minutes. Complex scenarios with many modules take longer.
Which Make alternative has the most integrations?
Zapier has the most integrations at 8,000+ apps. Make has 2,000+. n8n has 400+. Miniloop takes a different approach where workflows are Python code that can call any API directly.
Is Make.com better than Zapier?
Make is better for complex data transformation and visual workflow building. Zapier is better for simplicity and integration breadth. Make costs less per operation. Zapier is easier to learn. Choose Make for power, Zapier for simplicity.
